Monday, June 30, 2014

Jacob Huggins and Mary Akers' Wedding Bond--and a brief note on Leroy Akers


Thanks to cousin Rob Riley for pulling the original wedding bond for Jacob Huggins Sr and Mary Akers (Orange, NC--1793).

You can see how the clerk, A B Bruce, made his loop at the start of the letter 'u' a bit too big and the name around Jacob's mark looks like "Haggans."  And that's how it ended up becoming indexed that way.  However, the first line clearly shows his surname to be Huggins. So there is no doubt.

The key thing here is that the marriage year is 1793.  Jacob Jr can be found in both the 1850 and 1860 census--and he seems not to have caught the nasty Ward habit of radically misstating ages.  In both instances, his reported age gives the birth year of 1794.  And, unless someone has a family Bible hidden away somewhere, this is pretty much all the evidence we are likely to ever get.  All in all, it's safe to conclude that Jacob Jr was the son of Jacob Sr and Mary Akers Huggins.

Whether Mary was a widow--or just had Leroy Akers (and likely others, according to the census) as a bastard child--is impossible to say given what we currently know.  But, because we can conclude that Jacob Jr was Mary's son, we can also reasonably say that he was the half-brother of Leroy Akers.

One can also infer that Jacob Sr was really taken with Leroy.  As you saw in a previous post, Jacob sold one of his two tracts to Leroy in 1807.  But even more indicative is the small notation on one of  the issuing deeds of Jacob's two land grants:

This is from Orange Co NC  Bk 12, p. 277 (1798).

Reports vary on Leroy's exact birth year (and I'll get into that another time when dealing with Leroy's 'mistaken' wife), but it ranges from 1783-1786.  So, we can say that Leroy was anywhere from 12-15 years old when this grant/deed was finally formally issued. 

Clerks were required to note who was given the official copy of the grant/deed.  Jacob, himself, collected his first grant--and it clearly reads at the bottom; "Deliv'd Jacob Huggins."
If you click on the one above, you will see written along the bottom left-hand side: "Deliv'd Leroy Akors."
That's a lot of trust to put in a young teenage boy....
                                                                          <Kevin>

Monday, June 16, 2014

The Wards Caswell Co Church

Courtney has asked about the Wards' Church that I mentioned in one post...

There are a couple of things here that will certainly be of interest to Huggins descendants:

Lynches Creek Primitive Baptist Church was just North of the Orange Co line.  Today all that's left is a just a small gathering of gravestones, surrounded by a fence.  Many of the stones are now being engulfed by the woods.

  According to the church records, the very first Ward to become a member of the Lynches Creek was Susannah Ward, who joined by baptism in July, 1813.
   While about a dozen Wards eventually became members here--including Sutton's son, James and the latter's wife, Rebecca Oakley Ward--the ones of most interest here would be John and Linnea Ward and their daughter, Cassander.

    This particular John Ward married Linney (Melinda) Compton in 1809.  (Sutton Ward placed the bond.)  But this was not the John who was Sutton's son--that one died at the very same time as Sutton in Feb, 1816.
   To be honest, nobody has yet figured out just who the parents of this John were.

    But we do know this about him:  he was the only related John Ward alive in the area at the time of the wedding of Susannah Ward and Jacob Douglas Huggins.  So it was clearly this John Ward who placed the bond for that wedding in Oct, 1817. 
   Also, there is at least one estate file in Orange Co where you can see this John and Jacob Huggins Jr jointly indebt to the deceased's estate.  These two guys were very close even before Susannah married Jacob--to the point of borrowing money together.

    So, you can see that both Susannah and the bondsman of her wedding to Jacob Huggins Jr were both members of the Caswell church.  And it was this fact that led me to state that this was likely the reason the wedding took place in Caswell....

Saturday, June 14, 2014

The Akers--where next?

This is where Cluster Theory comes in (you can read about that in an early post).

We know that Leeroy Akers was born in VA....as was his wife, Rebecca Nealey.

So these entries from the old Augusta books sticks out right away:

Processioners' Returns) - 1765: Wm. Bryans and Jas. Neely report as follows, viz: For James Bryan (on Roanoke), for Wm. Bryan, Jr., for David Bryan (Geo. McAfee present), for Rees Bowin, for Hugh Mills, for David Cloyd (Tinker's Creek), for David Robinson, for Wm. Graham, for Wm. Graham (on Bufallo Creek), Benj. Paulson present; for Wm. Graham, Henry Holston present; for Peter Evans; for Thos. Tosh, Danl. McNeal present; for Jno. McAdoo, Jas. Mellin present; for David Dutton, Wm. Elam present; for Israel Christian, for Joseph Snodgrass, for Joseph Robinson, for John Neilly for Baptist Armstrong, present Thomas Acres; for Wm. Carvin, for Wm. Terry, for Thomas Ackers, for James Neilly (on Carson's Creek).


29th January, 1750-51. William Alexander's appraisement, by Thomas Tosh, Wm. Akers, James Neeley.

While I'm not sure I have the time to keep digging right now.  This is surely where I'd look.

Besides...the old census records show a cluster of Akers/Acres in Franklin Co Va (as well as Montgomery Co for that matter).  Franklin is just north of the NC border and not all that far from the Huggins....

Happy hunting!
                       

So what about Mary Acres Huggins?

I'm going to start with the 1810 census here.  It doesn't matter which of the double-count entries you wish to look at--the one next to the Wards (which we know is where Jacob lived), or the one showing him by the young Leeroy Acres.  In both cases Jacob shows to be over 45 and so does his wife.

We know that Jacob made out his will on 7 Oct 1809, but clearly he lived on for a time as the will wasn't proven until Nov 1813.  Hence we still see him alive (if not so well) in the 1810 census.  And we also know that his wife, Mary, was alive since he leaves half of his estate to her.

The main thing here, though, is that the census tells us that Mary was over 45 years old and thus, born before 1765.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moving backwards to the 1800 census, we find the following entry for Jacob Huggins:

1 male   45+  (born before 1755) Obviously Jacob
2 males  10-16 (born 1784-1790)
1 male under 10 (born 1791-1800) Quite likely Jacob Douglas Huggins Jr

1 female 45+  (born before 1755)
1 female 16-26 (born 1774-1784)

And this is why I decided to start with the 1810 census.  I wanted to rule out any chance that Jacob was 'robbing the cradle'--that is to say, the female showing 16-26 was clearly not Mary Acres Huggins.  She's way too young.  The 1810 census showed us Mary had to be born before 1765. Now the 1800 census helps narrow that down a bit more.  Here we see that Mary had to be born prior to 1755.

As we have seen, Leroy Akers was born in 1786. (So we can figure he was one of the two males showing born between 1784-1790).
Mary is at least 31 years older than him.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Here's what Leeroy is showing us:  Since he's at least 31 years younger than Mary,  we have 3 options (remember, the only people named in Jacob's will are Mary and son, Jacob Jr).

1)  Mary was single when she married Jacob and Leeroy is her younger brother.  Not highly likely at all given the age discrepancy.
2)  Mary was single and had several bastard children over the years, Leeroy being one of them.   The other two are living with them--or, at least one of them could be someone 'bound' to Jacob.  Certainly possible. But how probable is it?
3)  Mary was a widow who had several children while living in VA.  Sometime between 1786 or so and 1793, her husband died.  She somehow ended up meeting and marrying Jacob Huggins.  This is by far the most likely scenario.
   If nothing else, all of this tells us where to begin to look for Mary.

The will of Jacob Huggins certainly seems to strongly infer that Jacob Jr was the son of he and Mary.  But it never actually says that from what I can see.  This means there is a small 'window'--if you will--where it's possible (but not very likely) that Jacob Jr was born to a previous wife of Jacob's.  Although it's not likely, the best thing Huggins researchers can do is to gather every bit of census information--and any other documents/data--that help show Jacob Douglas Huggins' exact birth year.  That will certainly help 'nail things down.'

  For now, the working model is this:  Jacob Huggins Sr, marries the widow from VA, Mary Akers.  She brings several children with her.  She and Jacob then have Jacob Jr together.  The likely reason the two don't have anymore children is because Mary enters menopause.  Recall: she had to be born prior to 1755.  This means that by the time she and Jacob married in 1793, she had to be 38-39 years old--at a minimum.
  So, everything is starting to 'fit' together and we have a working model. But that's all it is--a model. It's looking like Mary Acres was a widow who brought some children with her into her marriage with Jacob Huggins Sr.  One of these clearly looks to be Leeroy Akers. 
  And this would mean that the deed I mentioned would be Jacob Huggins Sr selling to his stepson--Leeroy Akers.  It would also mean that Leeroy was the step-brother of Jacob Douglas Huggins.
   But where do we go next?
   We'll deal with that in the following post....

New movement along the Huggins line--the Akers



Preface:  Just want to make clear that nothing I say from here on out has anything to do with Huggins from Onslow Co..  After this point, anyone who wants to assert that the Orange Co Huggins line springs from Onslow will please come armed with some form of paper trail....;)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Again, thanks to Courtney for her comment mentioning the wedding of Jacob Huggins to Mary Acres on Nov 25, 1793 in Orange Co.  This one is for you!)

You've likely heard the old saying "Naked is the best disguise."  Well, we get to see this vividly in this posting.

So, Jacob Sr marries Mary "Acres" in 1793....
If you would like to, go back to my posting of 3/31/14 and click on the deed there.  You will see that it's Jacob Sr selling some of the land he owned next to John Ward to.....Leeroi AKERS.

Oops, we all missed that one entirely.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The next question is obvious.  Who is the Leeroi/Leroy/Leeroy Akers and what is his specific relation to Mary Akers Huggins?

Well, for one thing, we can find his wedding bond in the index:
Leeroy Akers to Rebecca Nealey  29 Oct 180?   Bond: Samuel Faucett.

We can then find him in the horrid 1810 Orange Co census two lines from Jacob Huggins (who was double-counted in this census, as were several other people I've seen).  Here, Leeroy is showing 18-25 years old.  This guy isn't much older than Jacob Douglas Huggins Jr!

Long story short:  jump way forward to 1850 and you can see Leeroy, age 64, in  Hickman TN. (He is indexed as Leeroy Aerois)
With him is wife Rebecca, age 72.  Two likely daughters: Arkela,  27, Elizabeth 24, both show being born in NC.
The major story here, though, is that both Leeroy and his wife are noted as being born in VA! And from this we get that Leeroy was born in 1786

The 1860 census confirms Leeroy's data.  Here you can see him in Humphreys TN living with the Singleton family. 
His age is 74; born in VA  Once again, Leeroy shows being born in 1786.

So now that we have Leeroy pinned down, the question is: what can he tell us about the Huggins line?  That will require a touch of analysis in the next post.


Thursday, June 12, 2014

But what about the DNA?

I guess the best place to start is by quoting from the first few lines of a brilliant and massive article, written by Jack Taylor, in an attempt to explain all the meanings of DNA results.  It goes like this:

"DO NOT READ FURTHER if you're hoping to substitute DNA for traditional genealogy, based on documents and records. DNA cannot tell you your ancestors' names or where they lived and can only estimate a probable range of time in which they might have lived.  DNA helps focus documentary research; it can't replace it. You should know genealogical time frames and standards. Always, answers to the meaning of matches involve probabilities – statistics"

  Right away--if any company is telling you that a specific person is a Most Recent Common Ancestor (MRCA), then they are full of it.  DNA testing simply cannot do this.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 So what about the "5 matches" that Courtney mentions in the comments section?  (Thanks, Courtney!  You've been a great help--I have a neat posting forthcoming with some new information about the Huggins line that I found solely because of your comments!)

As Jack Taylor's preface above shows, there are really only two 'rules'  to keep in mind:
1)  DNA testing always deals in probabilities, not specifics.
2)  A DNA result without a paper trail is almost useless.  (I will explain why I say "almost" later).
 
   In the case of Jacob Huggins of Orange Co NC, father of Jacob Douglas Huggins Jr who married Susanna Ward, here is the paper trail ( if we can call it that) of proof that he's the son of Jacob and Francis Cooper Huggins of Onslow Co NC:
    A)  They have the same name.

  That's all.  Not another scrap of evidence has ever been offered to support this claim.

   B) In response, we have shown dozens of documents, date conflicts, time and place contradictions, literacy conflicts, etc. that demonstrate that the Jacob Huggins in Orange Co (father of Jacob Douglas Huggins) cannot be the son of Jacob and Frances Cooper Huggins of Onslow Co.

   I would simply contend that descendents of Jacob Douglas Huggins deserve better.  They deserve a genealogy that is real--one that is documented and demonstrable.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So...what about the 5 matches? 
There is a corollary to Rule #2 that says this:
 2a)  A DNA 'match' is only as good as the paper trail.

Here's what I mean:
  It's pretty rare that folks given a list of matching test results ever know the specific documentation the other person(s) have for their professed lineage.

  Applying this specifically here (and I don't know any other way to say this other than being really blunt, sorry)  the first question is:  "How many of the 5 'matches' are descendents of Jacob Douglas Huggins and have been following the same crap genealogy that became online 'gospel?'" 

  Again, since it's rare that you get their documentation and actual lineage, this might be hard to say.  It may be that every single one of them fits this description.  My guess is that, if you were to be able to get all that information, you would find that many of them do.
   Thus, you can toss these matches out.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    But what if there is one match (or more) that is from someone who is from the Onslow line--and totally independent from Jacob Douglas Huggins of Orange Co?!
   That's actually an exciting thing.
 Recall that Rule #2 said: "A DNA result without a paper trail is almost useless."
     Here's why I insert the word "almost' in there:

   In this specific case, if there are people who 'match' your test coming from an independent Onslow line, then take note of how Onslow Huggins researchers keep focusing on Maryland (with lots of good reasons) as the likely originating point of that Huggins line prior to coming into the Onslow area.  There were early Huggins in Somerset Co MD...also some in Anne Arundel. 
   And, as I have shown in a previous post, there was a John Huggins in Baltimore Co by 1730 living right by our Wards who then had a son named Jacob Huggins. 
  What these matching results would then be showing is that the line that came down to Onslow and the one that came down to Orange both may well have originated from the same point.  DNA can't really show you that Jacob Huggins of Orange Co came from Onslow, but it can show you that the two lines had a common ancestor at some place and time previously.  That focal point would be Maryland--or, possibly previous to that, I suppose.
   In this case, DNA testing can hint to us 'where to look next.'  That's its one use devoid of a paper trail.  And that's why I use the word "almost" in Rule #2.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  In that light, assuming you have matches with someone from the Onslow Huggins whose lineage is independent of Orange Co.,  then it all comes down to the 'quality' of the match.

  For example, let's say you matched 35 of 37 markers with one of these people.  All that means, really, is that you have a 90% probability of sharing a common ancestor within the last 360 years.  There is a 95%  probability that your common ancestor was in the last 420 years.

  And, although, it's impossible for DNA to name a specific person--results like this are exciting in that the two different lines may each point to a common place of origin. And that can help us know what to look for.

   I hope that all was a bit more clear than mud.  Feel free to hammer me with questions.
                                                              <Kevin>





One last point about the two different Jacob Huggins

I should have mentioned the following in my last post as well:

The assembled online genealogies of the Huggins family from Onslow go something like this:

Jacob Huggins is b. about 1740 and marries Francis Cooper between 1762 and 1765.

They have son Jacob who was born between 1763 and 1765 and married Salomey Roberts on Sept 22, 1790 in Onslow Co.

Now, let's look at the 1800 census, once again:

1) The Jacob Huggins in Orange Co is showing to be 45+ years old.
   A) This means he's born prior to 1755.  At this time the Jacob who would marry Frances Cooper back in Onslow was only about 15 years old, given his reported birth year.
   B) This also places Jacob of Orange being born anywhere from 7-10 years before the reported wedding dates of Jacob and Frances.

2) The Jacob Huggins in Onslow Co is showing to be 26-44 years of age. 
   A) This places his birth year between  1756 and 1774.  His reported birth year of 1763-65 fits in perfectly here.
   B)  It also means he's young enough to be the son of Jacob Sr and Frances Copper--and thus a perfect 'fit' to be the one who married Salomey Roberts.

It all comes down to the simple fact that the age of Jacob Huggins of Orange is far too old to be a son of Jacob Huggins and Frances Cooper.


Wednesday, June 11, 2014

The Huggins line--a summation

In one of the first posts on this blog I briefly discussed methodology.  I talked about what we call "Spot it, got it" genealogy.  For those interested, I refer them back to that post for all the details....

The story:  I'm sure it happened something like this.  At some point, years ago, someone researching the line of Jacob Huggins from Orange Co NC noticed a wedding record in Onslow Co NC.  It was for a Jacob Huggins and the year was 1790.  The person thought:
1) "Hey!  This is at pretty much the right time"
2) "This is in the same state of North Carolina" (albeit almost 200 miles away)
3) "And, this guy has the very same name!"
4) "This must be our guy!"

And so this person then puts it on their webpage... or their online tree...or in a genweb posting.  Over the next few years, person after person takes this as 'gospel' and puts it on their own tree...or webpage.  Several years later, this is now the 'accepted' line.  People see it in writing and think "It must be true."  And that's that.

Except for one thing:  The actual amount of proof sums up to this:
1) They had the same name
2)  They lived in roughly the same time period
3) They came from the same state (but we won't mention the two locations were almost 200 miles apart...).

That's it.  There are no documents offered in support. No actual proof at all.  It just comes down to the fact that someone spotted a guy who had the same name....and then jumped to a conclusion.

This sort of thing has been a pox upon so many lines I've researched.  It's something to always keep in mind and watch for.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1a)  The Jacob Huggins of Orange Co (father of Jacob Douglas Huggins, Jr) was in Orange Co by at least 1788 and owned 100 acres--as I have shown in a previous posting of the Orange Co tax list.
1b) The Jacob Huggins who was the son of Jacob and Frances Cooper Huggins was in Onslow Co helping to settle his father's estate in 1790.

2.  The Jacob Huggins of Onslow then went on to buy land in that county in all the years I've mentioned previously.  The image of the original from the Onslow deed book in 1800 in that posting shows this Jacob involved a transaction that is witnessed by his two brothers, Luke and Cooper Huggins (seen in the bottom left of the second page).  This links this Jacob Huggins fully with the other off-spring of Jacob and Frances (these sons' names are all noted in Jacob Sr's will from 1790). There can be little doubt that this is their son, Jacob Jr.  The deed also refers to him as "Jacob Huggins of Onslow County...."

3a)  Every document involving Jacob Huggins of Orange Co is signed by a mark--indicating that the was illiterate.
3b)  Every document involving Jacob Huggins of Onslow Co is fully signed.  This man was literate.

4) This one is easy and fun.  Go to Ancestry and bring up the 1790 census.  For the name, type in "Jacob Huggins."  For the location, simply put "North Carolina.
   You will get two top hits:  A Jacob Huggins in Orange Co and one in Onslow.

   Now do the same with the 1800 census:  The top two hits:

    One in Wilmington, Onslow, NC
    One in Hillsborough, Orange, NC

  Repeat with 1810:

    One in Onslow, NC
    One in Hillsborough, Orange, NC

  It's a wonderful, graphic depiction that these are not the same men.  And there's a message in this as well...  Had the person who first 'spotted' the marriage bond of a Jacob Huggins in Onslow Co taken just a few minutes to check the most basic thing of all in genealogy--the Census-- they would have found out right away that these weren't the same guys....

So, the evidence is overwhelming that the Jacob Huggins in Orange Co was not the Jacob Huggins who was the son of Jacob and Frances Cooper Huggins in Onslow Co.
  The only evidence in support of them being the same person is that they shared the same name.
   If someone out there wants to provide a document that says otherwise, I'm wide open and would love to see it. Please share it with us....

But what about DNA results, I hear you say. :)  Sadly, it's late and I'll have to deal with that another time.
                                                                                           <Kevin>